Between 1962-1975, an estimated 40,000 babies were born in Southeast Asia, who were fathered by U.S. servicemen.
In most, if not all of the Pacific nations, mixed-race babies born to U.S. servicemen, are not considered citizens of local countries, and therefore outside of the benefits and protections provided to the mainstream citizens. Race and nation and gender become very much a part of both the mothers and the children themselves.
In almost every case, children born to African-American servicemen, are stigmatized by the notion of blackness-as-inferior. If the occupation, or presence of U.S. soldiers over a long period of time, involves a history of war on their land, then the stigma of being the “enemy” child intensifies the resentment. This gives rise to the intense political, social, and psychological fabric of Pacific life. This is also a question of the memory of the United States as a country in these nations, as well as the maintenance of the control of women’s bodies, and the sequestering and control of “impure blood” elements of what nationalism often requires.
In 1982, the United States passed the Amerasian Immigration Act allowing children from Vietnam, Korea, Laos, Cambodia, and Thailand, without mothers present, or siblings, to immigrate to the United States and be adopted by American families. However, the Vietnamese government resisted this act and did not publicize this new law/act. It is because the mixed-race orphans fathered by American GIs in the Pacific, were considered a “bad element” of Vietnamese society and the law was too limited, not allowing single mothers and families stigmatized by Vietnamese society, to leave Vietnam.
In other words, Vietnam wanted as many of these “Children of the Dust” to be gone.
In 1987, the United States Congress passed the Amerasian Homecoming Act. This law focused primarily on Vietnamese Amerasian children. It would permit mothers and other immediate family members to relocate to America with the Amerasian children.
Between 1987 and 1994, over 25,000 Vietnamese Amerasians, by then between 12-25 years old, and 60,000 to 70,000 family members of these Amerasians, immigrated to the United States. The largest portion of them settled in California.
It is interesting to note that the original Amerasian Act did not include children who were fathered by U.S. servicemen in Okinawa, Japan and the Philippines, even though the social issues and intensity of the realities created were just as important. One must question the politics of Japan and the Philippines in relation to the United States at the time these laws are passed. It is true that people–yes, even children and women, are pawns in geopolitical games. Beyond this, what kind of social justice actions must we take? If the U.S. military and Pacific national governments will only maintain their identities through their privileges and prejudices, how will social change come about?
VIETNAMESE AMERASIAN CALIFORNIA STUDY:
Posted in: African-American, African-American servicemen, Afro-Asian, Afro-Filipino, Afro-Japanese, Afro-Korean, Afro-Okinawan, Afro-Vietnamese, Amerasian アメラジアン, Anti-Miscegenation, ブラック パシフィック, bụi đời, biracial, Black Filippino, Black Japanese, Black Korean, Black Okinawan, Black Orientalism, Black Pacific, Black servicemen, Black VIetnamese, Blackanese, Blackapina / Blackapino, Blasian, Blorean, Cambodia, citizenship, con lai, De-colonization, Document, Eurasian, Filipino, Guam / Guåhan, Honyol, Japanese, Korea, Laos, Mỹ lai, militarism, Military Industrial Complex, Mixed Race, multiracial, Neo-colonization, người lai, Occupation of Japan 日本占領, Occupation of Okinawa 沖縄占領, Occupation of South Korea, Occupation of the Philippines, orphans, Patriarchy, Philippines, Racism, Research, Sexism, Social Justice, Southeast Asia, Thailand, transpacific racism, transpacific sexism, VIetnam, Vietnam, war babies